Anthropic's and Google's newest models sit at opposite ends of the price range. Claude Fable 5.1, released on September 1, 2026, is Anthropic's most capable generally available model and costs $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens. Gemini 3.8 Flash, released a day later, is what Google calls its best reasoning and coding model yet, at an introductory $0.75 and $3.75 through 2026. Both have a context window of about 1M tokens. Fable 5.1 reads text, images and documents, and Gemini 3.8 Flash adds video and audio input.
Anthropic aims Fable 5.1 at long, unattended work: codebase-wide features, code review and multi-hour agent runs. It keeps adaptive thinking on at all times and routes many flagged cybersecurity and biology requests to Opus models. Google aims 3.8 Flash at long-horizon coding and agents at Flash prices, notes that it can use more tokens at higher effort, and builds it into Search, Sheets and the Gemini app. On LMArena's crowd-voted text leaderboard in late September 2026, Fable 5.1 ranked a few places above Gemini 3.8 Flash, whose rating was still preliminary. The price gap is large, so check whether Flash handles your prompts before paying for Fable.
Which should you choose?
Claude
Claude Fable 5.1 · 1M context
Pick it if
you run multi-hour coding or research tasks and want Anthropic's most capable model.
Gemini
Gemini 3.8 Flash · 1M context
Pick it if
you want low per-token cost, video and audio input, or Gemini inside Google Search and Sheets.
Claude Fable 5.1 is the pick for long agentic coding and research runs where you want Anthropic's strongest model. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs a fraction as much per token, takes video and audio, and lives inside Google's apps. Start with Flash and move to Fable if the results fall short.
Questions
Is Claude or Gemini better for coding?
Both vendors aim their newest model at coding. In OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra launch table, a third-party view of both, Gemini 3.8 Flash scored higher than Claude Fable 5.1 on DeepSWE and Fable 5.1 scored much higher on Terminal-Bench 4.0. Test the tasks you care about on both.
Which has the bigger context window?
They are effectively level. Claude Fable 5.1 has a 1M-token window with up to 128K output tokens, and Gemini 3.8 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens and returns up to 65,536.